skip to main content


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Traversi, Rita"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract. Even though the Arctic is remote, aerosol properties observed there arestrongly influenced by anthropogenic emissions from outside the Arctic. Thisis particularly true for the so-called Arctic haze season (January throughApril). In summer (June through September), when atmospheric transportpatterns change, and precipitation is more frequent, local Arctic sources,i.e., natural sources of aerosols and precursors, play an important role.Over the last few decades, significant reductions in anthropogenic emissionshave taken place. At the same time a large body of literature shows evidencethat the Arctic is undergoing fundamental environmental changes due toclimate forcing, leading to enhanced emissions by natural processes that mayimpact aerosol properties. In this study, we analyze 9 aerosol chemical species and 4 particleoptical properties from 10 Arctic observatories (Alert, Kevo, Pallas,Summit, Thule, Tiksi, Barrow/Utqiaġvik, Villum, and Gruvebadet and ZeppelinObservatory – both at Ny-Ålesund Research Station) to understand changesin anthropogenic and natural aerosol contributions. Variables includeequivalent black carbon, particulate sulfate, nitrate, ammonium,methanesulfonic acid, sodium, iron, calcium and potassium, as well asscattering and absorption coefficients, single scattering albedo andscattering Ångström exponent. First, annual cycles are investigated, which despite anthropogenic emissionreductions still show the Arctic haze phenomenon. Second, long-term trendsare studied using the Mann–Kendall Theil–Sen slope method. We find in total41 significant trends over full station records, i.e., spanning more than adecade, compared to 26 significant decadal trends. The majority ofsignificantly declining trends is from anthropogenic tracers and occurredduring the haze period, driven by emission changes between 1990 and 2000.For the summer period, no uniform picture of trends has emerged. Twenty-sixpercent of trends, i.e., 19 out of 73, are significant, and of those 5 arepositive and 14 are negative. Negative trends include not only anthropogenictracers such as equivalent black carbon at Kevo, but also natural indicatorssuch as methanesulfonic acid and non-sea-salt calcium at Alert. Positivetrends are observed for sulfate at Gruvebadet. No clear evidence of a significant change in the natural aerosolcontribution can be observed yet. However, testing the sensitivity of theMann–Kendall Theil–Sen method, we find that monotonic changes of around 5 % yr−1 in an aerosol property are needed to detect a significanttrend within one decade. This highlights that long-term efforts well beyonda decade are needed to capture smaller changes. It is particularly importantto understand the ongoing natural changes in the Arctic, where interannualvariability can be high, such as with forest fire emissions and theirinfluence on the aerosol population. To investigate the climate-change-induced influence on the aerosolpopulation and the resulting climate feedback, long-term observations oftracers more specific to natural sources are needed, as well as of particlemicrophysical properties such as size distributions, which can be used toidentify changes in particle populations which are not well captured bymass-oriented methods such as bulk chemical composition. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract. In this study, we present atmospheric ice-nucleating particle (INP)concentrations from the Gruvebadet (GVB) observatory in Ny-Ålesund(Svalbard). All aerosol particle sampling activities were conducted in April–August 2018. Ambient INP concentrations (nINP) were measured for aerosolparticles collected on filter samples by means of two offline instruments:the Dynamic Filter Processing Chamber (DFPC) and the West Texas CryogenicRefrigerator Applied to Freezing Test system (WT-CRAFT) to assesscondensation and immersion freezing, respectively. DFPC measured nINPs for aset of filters collected through two size-segregated inlets: one fortransmitting particulate matter of less than 1 µm (PM1), theother for particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 µmaerodynamic diameter (PM10). Overall, nINPPM10 measured by DFPC ata water saturation ratio of 1.02 ranged from 3 to 185 m−3 attemperatures (Ts) of −15 to −22 ∘C. On average, the super-micrometer INP (nINPPM10-nINPPM1) accounted forapproximately 20 %–30 % of nINPPM10 in spring, increasing in summer to45 % at −22 ∘C and 65 % at −15 ∘C. This increase in super-micrometer INP fraction towards summer suggests that super-micrometeraerosol particles play an important role as the source of INPs in theArctic. For the same T range, WT-CRAFT measured 1 to 199 m−3. Althoughthe two nINP datasets were in general agreement, a notable nINP offset wasobserved, particularly at −15 ∘C. Interestingly, the results ofboth DFPC and WT-CRAFT measurements did not show a sharp increase in nINPfrom spring to summer. While an increase was observed in a subset of ourdata (WT-CRAFT, between −18 and −21 ∘C), the spring-to-summernINP enhancement ratios never exceeded a factor of 3. More evident seasonal variability was found, however, in our activated fraction (AF) data, calculated by scaling the measured nINP to the total aerosol particleconcentration. In 2018, AF increased from spring to summer. This seasonal AFtrend corresponds to the overall decrease in aerosol concentration towardssummer and a concomitant increase in the contribution of super-micrometer particles. Indeed, the AF of coarse particles resulted markedly higher thanthat of sub-micrometer ones (2 orders of magnitude). Analysis of low-traveling back-trajectories and meteorological conditions at GVB matched to our INP data suggests that the summertime INP population isinfluenced by both terrestrial (snow-free land) and marine sources. Ourspatiotemporal analyses of satellite-retrieved chlorophyll a, as well as spatial source attribution, indicate that the maritime INPs at GVB may comefrom the seawaters surrounding the Svalbard archipelago and/or in proximityto Greenland and Iceland during the observation period. Nevertheless,further analyses, performed on larger datasets, would be necessary to reachfirmer and more general conclusions. 
    more » « less